DADDY, WHY ARE THERE CAMERAS POINTED AT ME?
Because Scott K. Bagwell pays the Davie Florida Police, and enjoys stalking young boys, and making unfounded calls to the child abuse hotline and Davie Police.
He is protected from arrest by Lieutenant MICHAEL ALLEN of the Davie Florida Police Department. (On May 2, 2007, we learned that Lt. Michael Allen headed the Narcotics Division of the Davie Florida Police Department.)
Please turn your speakers on. The voice you hear threatening to call "HRS" and sleep "with your girlfriend" (Erin was about 7 months pregnant with our 2nd child) is Scott Kevin Bagwell.
Hit "reload" on your browser to replay this audio clip.
child endangerment: http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/terms/endangerment.html
Upon learning that a government witness/informant against him had just suffered a heart attack, Scott Kevin Bagwell, friends with Broward Sheriffs Deputies and Davie Police, initiated another false report to the Child Abuse Hotline, stating that the government witness/informant had "7 RABID DOBERMANS." Davie Florida Police Officer Richard Wendrow called in Davie Florida's own "Child Abuse" investigators after HE WAS ORDERED OFF THE POSTED PROPERTY by the victim.
WITHOUT PERMISSION OR WARRANT (4th AMENDMENT), Davie Police Officer Richard Wendrow, Davie Police Detective JoAnne Carter, a 3rd Davie Officer, and BSO Deputy Investigator DEBRA SIMMONS, UNLAWFULLY ENTERED THE CURTILAGE AND HOME OF THE VICTIM A SECOND TIME, played with the allegedly rabid animals, and had the government witness' child removed.
Please keep in mind that our 4 dogs (not "7 RABID DOBERMANS") live OUTSIDE, and the child lives INSIDE the home (no emergency or exigency). Further, BSO DCF Investigator DEBRA SIMMONS had come to my home only months earlier, when Scott Kevin Bagwell initiated another unfounded call to the DCF Hotline that I had "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS" stored in my home.
This is the same BSO Agency that concealed and withheld evidence for convicted offender/stalker Scott K. Bagwell.
Want to RETALIATE against a government witness / informant AGAINST YOU?
Call the DCF Hotline, and tell them the Government Witness / Informant against you has "7 RABID DOBERMANS" in his yard.
We are being stalked by Scott K. Bagwell. These pictures were taken shortly
before Davie Police Officer Richard Wendrow and others trespassed after
being ordered off Posted property. The pictures show our son happily playing
with our "7 RABID DOBERMANS" - part of the more than 80% unfounded
Child Abuse HOTLINE reports.
I am an CI in a Federal investigation which included Scott Kevin Bagwell, who I personally documented and photographed with Cindy Carol Gregory, frequenting the Quintero residence in a black sports car, bearing Florida license tag "IO IRS." Gregory, Bagwell's girlfriend, swore under oath that she did not, but the pictures prove otherwise.
Bagwell then broke into my computer, and intercepted a privileged communication to my lawyer, Mr. Kenneth Hemmerle, Esq. Bagwell then brought suit for libel, solely using this stolen, wiretapped, interception.
17th JUDICIAL COURT, CASE 97-13631 CACE (18)
PRELIMINARY NOTES REGARDING ELECTRONICALLY STORED COMMUNICATIONS:
"Access" means being able to acquire communications contents. "Intercept" means actually doing so (by means of a device). Smith, 155 F.3d at 1058.
Smith noted that Title II's prohibition on unauthorized access might have been violated by making unauthorized use of a password and "roaming about" the voicemail system without intercepting message "contents," but that once Smith's message was "retrieved and recorded," the line between Title II and Title I had been crossed and an "interception" occurred. Ibid.
18 U.S.C. § 2701 - Unlawful Access to Stored Communications
Felony charges require proof of one additional element: that the defendant acted "for purposes of commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial gain, or in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act." 18 U.S.C. § 2701(b)(1).[FN1]
The penalties for unlawful access to stored communications are divided into three categories. For first-time violations not committed for a specified improper purpose (that is, not committed "for purposes of commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial gain, or in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act"), the maximum penalty is one year imprisonment and a $100,000 fine. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701(b)(2)(A), 3571(b)(5). For repeat violations not committed for an improper purpose, or for first-time violations committed for an improper purpose, the maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701(b)(1)(A), (b)(2)(B), 3571(b)(3). For repeat violations committed for an improper purpose, the maximum penalty is ten years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701(b)(1)(B), 3571(b)(3).
Florida State Statutes:
934.03 Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited.--
(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any person who:
(a) Intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication;
(b) Intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when:
1. Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or
2. Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication;
(c) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection;
(d) Intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; or
(e) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted by means authorized by subparagraph (2)(a)2., paragraph (2)(b), paragraph (2)(c), s. 934.07, or s. 934.09 when that person knows or has reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of such a communication in connection with a criminal investigation, has obtained or received the information in connection with a criminal investigation, and intends to improperly obstruct, impede, or interfere with a duly authorized criminal investigation;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (4).
934.06 Prohibition of use as evidence of intercepted wire or oral communications; exception.--
Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the state, or a political subdivision thereof, if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter. The prohibition of use as evidence provided in this section does not apply in cases of prosecution for criminal interception in violation of the provisions of this chapter.
History.--s. 6, ch. 69-17; s. 4, ch. 89-269.
The Defendant was solicited by telephone by Attorney Lee H. Schillinger, who stated that the he was being sued, and to come to his office to talk about this. Amoral Attorney Lee H. Schillinger had no contract to represent the defendant, and the Defendant was not unaware and had not given consent for this amoral attorney to accept service on behalf of the Defendant. Attorney Lee H. Schillinger, to make a quick buck, unlawfully accepted service from the Plaintiffs, but withheld Affidavits, Evidence, and the Complaint from the Defendant.
The Defendant had never been sued before in a court of law for Libel, and was unaware that Attorney Solicitation was not allowed by Florida attorneys.
The Defendant never received the Complaint, affidavits, or evidence contained in the service. Amoral Attorney Lee Harris Schillinger had been involved in a zoning re-hearing
Upon completion of the "trial," the Defendant took the documents from Amoral Attorney Lee H. Schillinger, and read them. Rather than going back and shooting the judge and both attorneys, the Defendant joined the American Bar Association as an Associate, and now puts this sham of a case together:
This is a suit for Libel and all the trimmings (pain, suffering, the kitchen sink, etc, played by ear. It was based on the 16 yr old kid who cut the Plaintiffs grass INTERCEPTING the Defendant's Communication to his attorneys: Attorney Ralph Burns and Attorney Kenneth Hemmerle II.
Rather than turn this matter over to the FBI as a Computer Intrusion (Interception), Stalking, Retaliation Against a Government Witness/Informant against the Plaintiffs, and many more Federal and State Crimes, Amoral Hollywood, Florida attorney Lee Harris Schillinger and his partner, Attorney John A. Brekka, joined the plaintiffs and their attorney, Marc A. Chandler, in their scheme to defraud Defendant LLoyd W. Phillips.
This is how this scheme unfolded:
Jodi Needles, a Sun Sentinel Newspaper Reporter, was given lawful authorization to access, download, and use a specific picture relating to a story she was doing on corrupt Town Of Davie Code Inspectors. (The Defendant later filed a perjury report with the Town Of Davie regarding a code hearing in which he was tried twice, and found guilty because of perjured testimony by a Town Official.) Needles approached the Defendant after this hearing.
The numeric passcode to access a private subdirectory of the Defendant's business computer was given to Plaintiffs by Jodi Needles (trafficking in passwords to further her career) on the morning on August 15, 1997. This numeric passcode was given without the Defendant's knowledge or authorization . Needles telephoned the Plaintiffs per deposition, and gave this information to them in order to create a story.
Plaintiffs SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL and CINDY CAROL GREGORY schemed and conspired to oppress, threaten, intimidate, and injure (hit with their car) the Defendant in violation of Federal Law, 18 U.S.C. 241. Plaintiffs SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL and CINDY CAROL GREGORY also solicited, conspired, and schemed, with 16 yr old ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., his parents, MARY GODDARD and JEFFERY GODDARD, Attorney MARC. A. CHANDLER, and others, to unlawfully obtain money and property from Defendant LLoyd W. Phillips, in violation of Florida Statute 815.06(2)(b), a SECOND DEGREE FELONY, (Florida Statute 777.04(2)(3) CRIMINAL SOLICITATION), and Federal Law, 18 U.S.C. §1341,
Plaintiffs schemed to repeatedly "exceed authorization" and "INTERCEPT" Confidential, Intellectual Property from the Defendant's business computer (a Government Witness/Informant against them), in violation of Federal Law, 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4) and 18 U.S.C. §2701(a)(2), and to unlawfully ACCESS and INTERCEPT the Defendant's private, electronically stored Intellectual Property and privileged communication to his attorneys, Ralph Burns and Ken Hemmerle of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2511(a).
To complete their scheme, the plaintiffs needed someone to "discover" this allegedly libelous material, and "think less of them."
Per Deposition, 16 yr old Robert Thomas Newton Jr., confirmed in sworn testimony that he was the "friend" in police report #BS-97-08-07985 who the Plaintiffs called to ACCESS, INTERCEPT, and PRINT the Defendant's electronically stored communication to his attorneys. This removes all doubt that the Plaintiffs initiated the scheme, and that 16 yr old Robert Thomas Newton Jr., agreed and cooperated in this scheme to Defraud, Slander, and Libel the defendant in his personal and business good name, and forever cause false instruments and records to be generated in official proceedings that will forever damage the Defendant, in addition to fees and fraudulent awards far exceeding $100,000.00.
It is further a violation of State and Federal Law to use INTERCEPTED PROPERTY OBTAINED BY WIRETAP AS EVIDENCE (PER 18 U.S.C. §2515 AND FLORIDA STATE STATUTE §934.06).
The Plaintiffs also gathered their own evidence. Plaintiffs' 16yr old witness admitted under oath to being out of state, on vacation during a portion of this scheme, and Plaintiffs Bagwell and Gregory, with their attorney MARC A. CHANDLER (attorney became co-conspirator), along with Defendant's Attorney, Lee Harris Schillinger, personally admitted computer intrusion and withholding exculpatory evidence (EVIDENCE TAMPERING).
Plaintiffs admitted in deposition that they personally and repeatedly INTERCEPTED documents from the Defendant's computer, in their scheme with others to deprive the Defendant of his freedom, privacy, family, children (calling child protective after Plaintiff Bagwell was caught luring Defendant's 4 and 6 year old children over a fence with the promise of candy [Police Report taken]), a fair trial, right to an attorney, services, property, and things of value guaranteed by the Constitution, in this fraudulent Libel suit in violation of 18 U.S.C. §241.
Schemes are subject to errors proportional to their complexity and the number of parties involved.
The Plaintiffs' 16 yr old key witness blatantly identified and swore under oath in deposition that he printed out original INTERCEPTED documents at 2119 hours "10:19 pm [sic]," and gave them to the Plaintiffs.
click here for NEWTON DEPOSITION, p35; 14-22: "...I printed these out at 2119 hours ......10:19 PM [sic]..."
The Plaintiffs swore that they handed these same original Intellectual Property printouts to Police as evidence at 1830 hours (6:30 pm"), 3 HOURS BEFORE THEY WERE PRINTED on the evening of August 15, 1997, in BSO Police Report #BS-97-08-07985.
click here for Plaintiff's Police Report, with CHAIN OF CUSTODY, dated August 15, 1997, evidence taken at 1830 hours (6:30 p.m.). The highlighted portions were confirmed under oath by Robert Thomas Newton Jr., in a 2nd Deposition by attorney Mark Grossman, who was employed by the Law Firm of Becker And Poliakoff. This second Deposition cost the Defendant $6,500.00
JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY, upon being informed by the Defendant that the evidence against the defendant was "INTERCEPTED" and that his attorney had "Unclean Hands" and was committing "Fraud Upon The Court," refused to take MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE as required by FSS §90.201 (JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT), and unlawfully allowed the Intellectual Property and Attorney-Client Privileged stolen property obtained by WIRETAP into evidence in violation of Federal Law 18 U.S.C. §2515 and State Law FSS §934.06. The Judge, himself, violated Federal Law, 18 USC §1512(a)(C).
Judges are also included under "COLOR OF LAW," 18 USC §242, and thus can be prosecuted Civilly under 42 USC §1983. The Defendant's electronically stored communiqué to the attorneys was protected from public access by a 5 digit numeric code: "14200"
The Defendants were GOVERNMENT INFORMANTS/WITNESSES against the Plaintiffs and the former owners of the Plaintiff's house, a Deported Columbian Alien, and were working with C.I.D. AGENT WARREN MARTIN. They were told NOT to disclose any conversations. The Defendant's attorney knew this.
The Defendant's attorneys, had they been honest, should have immediately sought Civil Damages for WIRETAPPING: 18 U.S.C. 2520, STALKING, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution, etc., but refused to do so when instructed. Furthermore, the Davie Florida Police Department refused to take ANY reports in this matter, CULPABLY stating it was NOT a criminal matter.
About 2 years later, just 30 miles away in Miami, Florida, Attorney General Janet Reno prosecuted a 16 yr old boy for the same crime, and received a SIX MONTHS sentence.
HACKER / Stalker / Plaintiff Scott K. Bagwell waves hello to the Defendant and his children.
On or about June of 2002, Scott Kevin Bagwell, upon learning from neighbor Steve Davila that the Defendant had suffered a heart attack, once again called the Florida Child Abuse Hotline, falsely reporting that LLoyd W. Phillips had rabid dogs who had not been vaccinated in 10 years. This was meant to physically and psychologically punish LLoyd W. Phillips for no purposeful reason. Since Mr. Phillips had suffered a heart attack several days earlier and was disabled, the following Florida Statutes apply: 825.102(1)(a)(b)(c) - Abuse of a disabled adult, a Third Degree Felony, and 825.102(2)(b) - Aggravated abuse of a disabled adult, a Second Degree Felony.
Scott Kevin Bagwell has maliciously interfered with the custody of a minor on four counts, a third degree felony (787.03 Interference with custody). Because the minor suffered physical and psychological harm, this resulted in a violation of Florida Statute 787.02(3)(a)(5) -in violation of s. 450.151.: False imprisonment of a child under age 13, with aggravating circumstances, a FIRST DEGREE FELONY.
I was instructed by U.S. Special Agent Warren Martin of the Deerfield Florida Branch of the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS not to divulge anything discussed as a Confidential Informant.
Agent Warren Martin Obstructed Justice by withholding evidence in this case.
But that wasn't enough for Bagwell. In addition to the computer Intrusion and Interception of a privileged communication (timeline) to my attorneys, Bagwell conspired with Attorney Lee Harris Schillinger of Hollywood Florida, Attorney Marc A. Chandler, Cindy Carol Gregory, 16 yr old hacker Robert Thomas Newton Jr., Detective John Berrina, and others, and then continued to stalk my family and children, with the aid of The Broward Sheriff's Office and the Davie Florida Police Department, who Bagwell paid protection money to (unlawful compensation) for unlawful all-night parties. These parties included live bands and DJs with professional sound systems, 60 feet from my children's bedroom window, and much more.
SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL: STALKING OF CHILDREN
Scott Kevin Bagwell knows the consequences of making false reports to the Child Abuse Hotline AND the Davie Florida Police Department, and is aware of the pain and suffering this causes to an innocent family. Mr. Bagwell's stalking of our minor children elevates his offense to a felony per Attorney Neil Miller, of the Institute for Law and Justice, a consultant to the State Of Florida.
Since Bagwell's aggravated stalking of our minor children resulted in harm to the children, as documented by Broward County's CDTC, this felony is elevated to the next level.
According to court transcripts, former neighbors, and Child Protective Investigator Jeff Fisher, Scott Kevin Bagwell is no stranger to DCF and HRS. Scott Kevin Bagwell was reportedly forced to move from his former Whale Harbor Address because of reports of child abuse against him, according to Social worker Jeff Fisher in an in-depth interview.
VIDEO CLIPS OF THE AFFECT OF THE
ACTIONS OF SCOTT K. BAGWELL ON
OUR CHILDREN - click on images:
It hurts a parent to see their 4 yr old panic in his own bedroom, thanks to a neighbor. This was NOT New Years or the 4th of July. Our 2 yr old also could not understand what was causing the explosions. This was NOT New Years or the 4th of July. Our 4 yr old son was woken from a sound sleep. He had school the next day. This video was taken from inside our bathroom.
VIDEO CLIPS OF THE AFFECT OF THE
ACTIONS OF SCOTT K. BAGWELL ON
OUR PETS - click on image:
Bagwell's Frequent Arial Fireworks Scared Our Pets
and Caused Our Dog to Dig A Hole Under Our House.
click images to play videos
Even our backyard home movies of our children have Bagwell's nuisance stereo in them. His acid rock music is as loud as our child's voice. His sound system is left on all day, and sometimes all night. The image on the right is a calibrated, type-approved Sound Level Meter, with actual real-time SPL readings.
Scott K. Bagwell would come out in his underwear, and raise his middle finger when he heard our car starting.
Picture of Bagwell's TV Camera taken in 1997
He swore in court proceedings that this camera was mounted on his house, and facece his back yard, not ours.
DADDY, WHY ARE THERE CAMERAS POINTED AT ME?
Because Scott K. Bagwell pays the Davie Florida Police, and enjoys stalking young boys, and making unfounded calls to the child abuse hotline and Davie Police.
He is protected from arrest by Lieutenant MICHAEL ALLEN of the Davie Florida Police Department. (On May 2, 2007, we learned that Lt. Michael Allen headed the Narcotics of the Davie Police Department.)
Picture taken 2007: Scott Kevin Bagwell Falsely Swore Under Oath in 1997 That His TV Camera Was Pointed At His Back Yard, Not At Our Property.
Scott Kevin Bagwell also Testified Under Oath That He Focused His Camera On Our House, but "just for 10 seconds." Why would you focus a camera on your neighbor's house, unless you wanted a clear picture of your neighbors???
This should give you a better perspective of the difference in height of the adjacent Bagwell property. Please note that Bagwell's camera is aimed directly at our house (bedroom window).
Our youngest son says hello to the gentleman cutting Bagwell's grass.
According to Scott K. Bagwell, 14220 SW 29th Court, Davie, this is a midnight " roof inspection." He and his friend climbed up on his roof and watched and whistled at his neighbor's wife, while her 21 year old sister took a shower in the bathroom facing Bagwell. We know he was watching his neighbors, because he waved with his left hand, while he looked directly at the camera.
Bagwell, under oath, told a jury that he was inspecting his roof. But how do you conducted an inspection by sitting on the peak of a roof at midnight, with a can of beer, and no light?
NOTE: Police and social worker(s) lose their qualified immunity for their deprivation of rights and can be sued. Many social workers and Child Protection Services ("CPS") lose their cases in court because their entry into homes was in violation of the parents civil rights because the evidence in their possession did not satisfy the standard of probable cause.
It is not enough to have information that the children are in some form of serious danger. The evidence must also pass a test of reliability that our justice system calls probable cause. InH.R. v. State Department of Human Resources, 612 So.2d 477 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992); the court held that an anonymous tip standing alone never amounts to probable cause. The Calabretta court held the same thing, as have numerous other decisions, which have faced the issue directly. The Fourth Amendment itself spells out the evidence required for a warrant or entry order.
The United States Supreme Court has held that courts may not use a different standard other than probable cause for the issuance of such orders.Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987). If a court issues a warrant based on an uncorroborated anonymous tip, the warrant will not survive a judicial challenge in the higher courts. Anonymous tips are never probable cause.
Scott K. Bagwell's camera watches every movement of our family and pets in our house and yard. Both of these dogs have mysterously suddenly died.
We had to board up our son's window because of loud music played deliberately almost daily in the residence of Scott K. Bagwell, who would open the door to make it louder - EVEN WHEN IT WAS RAINING.
Bagwell prevents our sons from taking naps and sleeping through the night.
Audio levels at one of his 2003 parties exceed 80 dbA inside our bathroom on a calibrated SPL (Noise Level) Meter
Florida State Statute 877.03 Breach of the peace; disorderly conduct.--Whoever commits such acts as are of a nature to corrupt the public morals, or outrage the sense of public decency, or affect the peace and quiet of persons who may witness them, or engages in brawling or fighting, or engages in such conduct as to constitute a breach of the peace or disorderly conduct, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.--s. 1, ch. 59-325; s. 1147, ch. 71-136; s. 2, ch. 86-174.
Audio levels exceed 60 dbA at midnight in our toddler's boarded up bedroom on a calibrated SPL (Noise Level) Meter
Only once was Scott Kevin Bagwell finally prosecuted by the Town in County Court click here.
A year later, all but one of our dogs were dead.
In a subsequent Town Meetings, after the one in late 2003 where we once more pleaded with the Town to protect the safety and welfare of our family, Davie Town Council Member Lisa Hubert, who had said nothing, requested that the Town look into the welfare of a dog at a construction site. Davie Councilwoman Susan Starke stated that all residents had the right to enjoy theit property. Mayor Tom Truex was the only one who spoke to me, saying: "Would You Please Hurry Up."
Scott Kevin Bagwell, 14200 SW 29 Court, Davie Florida, said he would "take care of those f**kin dogs." Both of our Dobermans mysteriously died within a couple months of each other
admitted endangering their minor children by lowering them into a yard
with 2 Dobermans, climbing over our fence, trespassing in our yard, going up on
their roof at midnight (our bedroom and bathroom are on that side of our
house), and hiring a guy to follow us around with a camcorder.
"Chookie" was a gentle dog, who played with, and protected our son.
Convicted Offender/ STALKER, Scott Kevin Bagwell, 14200 SW 29 Court, Davie Florida, 33330, initiated his 2nd of three known calls to the Child Abuse Hotline, stating we had not vaccinated our dogs for 10 years, (this is true, because they were not even born 10 years ago), and that one of them was RABID.
Bagwell initiated a 3rd unfounded call of child abuse, but his paid pal, Lieutenant Michael Allen, continues to protect him.
I am a Government witness/Informant against Scott Kevin Bagwell and the former owners of the adjacent property.
We called BALASKY Animal Hospital to arrange to have them identify possible toxins and cremate our lifeless pet.
But the harassment didn't stop there. Someone called Animal Control, who then wanted to call DCF to have our children taken.
Scott Kevin Bagwell was observed with a camera by 2 Davie Police Officers. He had a smile on his face as he took pictures of our family.
On October 6, 2004, Sean who is now almost 4, helped take down the board over his window, since Scott K. Bagwell had stopped playing loud music on a regular basis.
Scott K. Bagwell's camera looks into our bedroom. We're letting the tree branches grow low, to help block his camera's view.
Scott Kevin Bagwell installed a very bright "Bud Lite" neon sign. Now Sean's bedroom is lit up with a blue glow from Bagwell's neon sign.
Please note the intensity of the Bagwell sign, compared to the street light in the bottom right picture.
Family Circuit Court Judge Lawrence Korda
Letter Says Broward County Circuit Judge Was Smoking Pot In Park In Drug-Free Zone
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, NAACP Demands Removal Of Family Court Judge Lawrence KordaPOSTED: 1:02 pm EDT March 22, 2007UPDATED: 3:38 pm EDT March 22, 2007
"...Broward Florida Circuit Court Judge Lawrence Korda being charged with possession and usage of marijuana on Sunday, March 18, 2007... ...The revelation that Judge Korda chose to openly use an illegal substance in a drug-free zone with children nearby clearly shows he is undeserving of this important position."
Korda, who was part of the Anna Nicole Smith proceedings, was in Stanley Goldman Park near Hollywood Boulevard on Sunday at about 2 p.m. when police patrolling the park smelled marijuana, followed the scent and found him seated on a bench, police said.
Korda, 59, was not arrested but was issued a notice to appear in court and faces a charge of marijuana possession, according to police.